Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-05 19:11:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E0CA4FBEE511ED6AF61DF09E9EA3AA7AA32E27A40CF24A2B33D1992BD29FA45
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the context provided is irrelevant. Also, we can’t use the Times as a reliable source anymore, generally, but especially not in this context where the discussion about the ways in which the Times allowed itself to be ideologically compromised, for money.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887204479474569511
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E0CA4FBEE511ED6AF61DF09E9EA3AA7AA32E27A40CF24A2B33D1992BD29FA45
  • createdAtMillis - 1738782694182
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18872044794745695115E0CA4FBEE511ED6AF61DF09E9EA3AA7AA32E27A40CF24A2B33D1992BD29FA45