Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 13:53:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the claim is factually correct. Additionally, the idea that these funds are for "subscriptions" in no way means they are not essentially funding grants. Call the line item what you will, it's still money used to fund the operation of a outfit that is intended to manipulate

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887203947246456976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935
  • createdAtMillis - 1738850021939
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18872039472464569760B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935