Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 18:38:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7BE8446FAE4CD941D26991730FE82546FACFC20E6F44F3D63704CC3D8581F79
Participant Details

Original Note:

While perhaps a little on the nose, what Mr. Steele posted is technically neither incorrect nor misleading. At the time of posting, 43,986 was, in fact, the number. Therefore, a community note isn't warranted. "It was correct when shared, but is out of date now" - CN guidelines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886474724122730618
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7BE8446FAE4CD941D26991730FE82546FACFC20E6F44F3D63704CC3D8581F79
  • createdAtMillis - 1738607915171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1886474724122730618B7BE8446FAE4CD941D26991730FE82546FACFC20E6F44F3D63704CC3D8581F79