Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 19:22:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56AC904BF4B2121D8B679884B95F44EBDEA14041CF60B5BB111FC8D4323E5654
Participant Details

Original Note:

While perhaps a little on the nose, what Mr. Steele posted is technically neither incorrect nor misleading. At the time of posting, 43,986 was, in fact, the number. Therefore, a community note isn't warranted. "It was correct when shared, but is out of date now" - CN guidelines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886474724122730618
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56AC904BF4B2121D8B679884B95F44EBDEA14041CF60B5BB111FC8D4323E5654
  • createdAtMillis - 1738610533917
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188647472412273061856AC904BF4B2121D8B679884B95F44EBDEA14041CF60B5BB111FC8D4323E5654