Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 23:15:21 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 629660B6F75480E3EA4A51ED2D6AFD02134F539FCBC31130F6D3306C6CC8219B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source for the proposed note doesn’t state where the $38M was spent. EcoHealth Alliance is named as the contractor, and the timing matches the Wuhan research. An intentionally obfuscated correlation is a logical assumption

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886474230029541692
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 629660B6F75480E3EA4A51ED2D6AFD02134F539FCBC31130F6D3306C6CC8219B
  • createdAtMillis - 1738624521382
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1886474230029541692629660B6F75480E3EA4A51ED2D6AFD02134F539FCBC31130F6D3306C6CC8219B