Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 19:35:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDBEB06C942B39631D46A66BBA723772B35F4120A3A4E3A0A2CDB3B3980AB045
Participant Details

Original Note:

The posted doc shows that UC Davis was the primary recipient but *subcontracted* the work. One of the key players in PREDICT-2 was the EcoHealth Alliance, who operated with the Wuhan Lab as part of it's work. The assertion that USAID funded G-O-F studies is reasonable. https://x.com/i/grok/share/NdtviM61oy1d9r7iFvV8DrLJi

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886469912539095219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BDBEB06C942B39631D46A66BBA723772B35F4120A3A4E3A0A2CDB3B3980AB045
  • createdAtMillis - 1738611318500
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1886469912539095219BDBEB06C942B39631D46A66BBA723772B35F4120A3A4E3A0A2CDB3B3980AB045