Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 18:31:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Gender fluidity is backed up by countless scientific papers and research programs." Yeah, that's the problem. Scientists who don't worship your god risk losing funding. This isn't "scientific consensus", it's a mafia.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886468189967585428
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1738607477128
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18864681899675854283EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC