Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 18:35:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07C347DBE12C4A9E18F98BFE09363E3395FBD065F6427B634E9CB807FD5388B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Gender fluidity is backed up by countless scientific papers and research programs." Yeah, that's the problem. Scientists who don't worship your god risk losing funding. This isn't "scientific consensus", it's a mafia.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886468189967585428
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07C347DBE12C4A9E18F98BFE09363E3395FBD065F6427B634E9CB807FD5388B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1738607751997
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188646818996758542807C347DBE12C4A9E18F98BFE09363E3395FBD065F6427B634E9CB807FD5388B3