Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 15:14:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B6C9F58EDDC94964B0FE59F9A8A6F7737F1B127482C25FAEC24D3DE43F30CE21
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim in a proposed CN that there is no evidence that the viral genome was not genetically modified ignores that there is no way to determine whether a genetic modification is a natural event or has been produced using the Crispr-Cas technology.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886312228950822946
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B6C9F58EDDC94964B0FE59F9A8A6F7737F1B127482C25FAEC24D3DE43F30CE21
  • createdAtMillis - 1738595669614
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1886312228950822946B6C9F58EDDC94964B0FE59F9A8A6F7737F1B127482C25FAEC24D3DE43F30CE21