Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 22:35:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BDD60916E48F2235F3DF04D51EC3D2EB6B92E5F7F26234A4FB79ECDB7EBB4CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim in a proposed CN that there is no evidence that the viral genome was not genetically modified ignores that there is no way to determine whether a genetic modification is a natural event or has been produced using the Crispr-Cas technology.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886312228950822946
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BDD60916E48F2235F3DF04D51EC3D2EB6B92E5F7F26234A4FB79ECDB7EBB4CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1738622112960
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18863122289508229467BDD60916E48F2235F3DF04D51EC3D2EB6B92E5F7F26234A4FB79ECDB7EBB4CF