Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-03 22:09:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E659269BB1C8AB04248F482C2D8152BE0737D4C2CDC12454D5313AF41BED8BD7
Participant Details

Original Note:

A ofensa de Bolsonaro a Maria do Rosário em 2003 não decorreu de ela “defender o Champinha”. A discussão foi sobre a redução da maioridade penal, que não afetaria Champinha, pois leis penais não retroagem. Associar Maria do Rosário ao caso carece de base factual. https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controvérsia_Jair_Bolsonaro–Maria_do_Rosário

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1886218590237467121
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E659269BB1C8AB04248F482C2D8152BE0737D4C2CDC12454D5313AF41BED8BD7
  • createdAtMillis - 1738620545324
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1886218590237467121E659269BB1C8AB04248F482C2D8152BE0737D4C2CDC12454D5313AF41BED8BD7