Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 20:41:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C70C73272D5F3EB34598E93D4074DFB658D6317780A66A11BBE1912AC1D483DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Extrait tronqué et de fait trompeur, datant d'il y a 4 mois. Dans cet extrait, l'avocat expose simplement les arguments des accusés, sans jamais affirmer ni présenter ces arguments comme une vérité. Voici l'extrait entier. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW5tbDyoGGw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885988090482700393
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C70C73272D5F3EB34598E93D4074DFB658D6317780A66A11BBE1912AC1D483DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1738528872891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885988090482700393C70C73272D5F3EB34598E93D4074DFB658D6317780A66A11BBE1912AC1D483DB