Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 23:01:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4DE9F9022CA3D2A9DD2C85B15014E33A10F4E0E44BC6454E88BD67514781B08
Participant Details

Original Note:

Extrait tronqué et de fait trompeur, datant d'il y a 4 mois. Dans cet extrait, l'avocat expose simplement les arguments des accusés, sans jamais affirmer ni présenter ces arguments comme une vérité. Voici l'extrait entier. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW5tbDyoGGw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885988090482700393
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4DE9F9022CA3D2A9DD2C85B15014E33A10F4E0E44BC6454E88BD67514781B08
  • createdAtMillis - 1738537313228
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885988090482700393C4DE9F9022CA3D2A9DD2C85B15014E33A10F4E0E44BC6454E88BD67514781B08