Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 01:56:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FAAF37D23BA1E37F1C06D4D5642B6752E8643B7C60C3635418CCA1C3E34E56A
Participant Details

Original Note:

ACT isn't "hiding" behind name suppression—courts grant it based on legal criteria, not party preference. If there's an issue, the law should be debated, not weaponized for political attacks. Name suppression applies to all under the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. communitylaw.org.nz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885847315115917488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FAAF37D23BA1E37F1C06D4D5642B6752E8643B7C60C3635418CCA1C3E34E56A
  • createdAtMillis - 1738461369689
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18858473151159174889FAAF37D23BA1E37F1C06D4D5642B6752E8643B7C60C3635418CCA1C3E34E56A