Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 01:26:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E4A8F6E24E3D842C5D771AE13CCC457F42E7B786B88A2AFD23FD8747B955594
Participant Details

Original Note:

ACT isn't "hiding" behind name suppression—courts grant it based on legal criteria, not party preference. If there's an issue, the law should be debated, not weaponized for political attacks. Name suppression applies to all under the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. communitylaw.org.nz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885847315115917488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E4A8F6E24E3D842C5D771AE13CCC457F42E7B786B88A2AFD23FD8747B955594
  • createdAtMillis - 1738459581603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18858473151159174888E4A8F6E24E3D842C5D771AE13CCC457F42E7B786B88A2AFD23FD8747B955594