Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 03:40:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B631C7DD658D187BECB138CB8AB484A0FAB61321D20C05889D6C4DCDEF16462
Participant Details

Original Note:

ACT isn't "hiding" behind name suppression—courts grant it based on legal criteria, not party preference. If there's an issue, the law should be debated, not weaponized for political attacks. Name suppression applies to all under the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. communitylaw.org.nz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885847315115917488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B631C7DD658D187BECB138CB8AB484A0FAB61321D20C05889D6C4DCDEF16462
  • createdAtMillis - 1738467646381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18858473151159174888B631C7DD658D187BECB138CB8AB484A0FAB61321D20C05889D6C4DCDEF16462