Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 01:30:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E615E35EA3A9663FA255E6F73ACB7947E81AE8D0EF84566AA6457A316EFCC6F
Participant Details

Original Note:

ACT isn't "hiding" behind name suppression—courts grant it based on legal criteria, not party preference. If there's an issue, the law should be debated, not weaponized for political attacks. Name suppression applies to all under the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. communitylaw.org.nz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885847315115917488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E615E35EA3A9663FA255E6F73ACB7947E81AE8D0EF84566AA6457A316EFCC6F
  • createdAtMillis - 1738459855596
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18858473151159174884E615E35EA3A9663FA255E6F73ACB7947E81AE8D0EF84566AA6457A316EFCC6F