Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 02:48:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A989D2F05672D6F2F0AC6E09AF0A4B7BF227FF50763D00D3871DDB87F1236D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

ACT isn't "hiding" behind name suppression—courts grant it based on legal criteria, not party preference. If there's an issue, the law should be debated, not weaponized for political attacks. Name suppression applies to all under the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. communitylaw.org.nz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885847315115917488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A989D2F05672D6F2F0AC6E09AF0A4B7BF227FF50763D00D3871DDB87F1236D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1738464519378
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18858473151159174884A989D2F05672D6F2F0AC6E09AF0A4B7BF227FF50763D00D3871DDB87F1236D4