Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 22:47:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 89E3D71EB1F553B0F3C94E7453B382DFF5A2E1F29ABFC15907390E40EEB85FFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge had solid reason for her decision. Her actions were in line with her predecessor who had originally started the case. Elon Musk could have resolved the situation had he proposed a modified payment plan, but he gambled on winning the case, and lost. https://x.com/stanfordNYC/status/1885776609287819508

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885809227324965331
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 89E3D71EB1F553B0F3C94E7453B382DFF5A2E1F29ABFC15907390E40EEB85FFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1738450049283
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 188580922732496533189E3D71EB1F553B0F3C94E7453B382DFF5A2E1F29ABFC15907390E40EEB85FFC