Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 05:47:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3233793A9EAA96FF4B5F73FB21A484D405C4476B65015562048599914B946C3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge had solid reason for her decision. Her actions were in line with her predecessor who had originally started the case. Elon Musk could have resolved the situation had he proposed a modified payment plan, but he gambled on winning the case, and lost. https://x.com/stanfordNYC/status/1885776609287819508

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885809227324965331
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3233793A9EAA96FF4B5F73FB21A484D405C4476B65015562048599914B946C3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1738475231147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18858092273249653313233793A9EAA96FF4B5F73FB21A484D405C4476B65015562048599914B946C3A