Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 23:46:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C43B43F89B309D431ADFF446CA6FFD7BE7B1E70EED33DD9B020ADEA5940D4EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge had solid reason for her decision. Her actions were in line with her predecessor who had originally started the case. Elon Musk could have resolved the situation had he proposed a modified payment plan, but he gambled on winning the case, and lost. https://x.com/stanfordNYC/status/1885776609287819508

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1885809227324965331
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2C43B43F89B309D431ADFF446CA6FFD7BE7B1E70EED33DD9B020ADEA5940D4EC
createdAtMillis - 1738453571418
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18858092273249653312C43B43F89B309D431ADFF446CA6FFD7BE7B1E70EED33DD9B020ADEA5940D4EC