Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 22:42:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A8113D54A952F842C9E9178D445CA45FDE0A79A7FF032C53916D15A88CEDD74
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge had solid reason for her decision. Her actions were in line with her predecessor who had originally started the case. Elon Musk could have resolved the situation had he proposed a modified payment plan, but he gambled on winning the case, and lost. https://x.com/stanfordNYC/status/1885776609287819508

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885809227324965331
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A8113D54A952F842C9E9178D445CA45FDE0A79A7FF032C53916D15A88CEDD74
  • createdAtMillis - 1738449724796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18858092273249653312A8113D54A952F842C9E9178D445CA45FDE0A79A7FF032C53916D15A88CEDD74