Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 15:35:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9880A05CD662612BE9ABEA4A7AB06B72BD41E2BACA6FBF50DD90DB51EFED3628
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the credibility of the journal is a subjective opinion of the author and belongs in comments section

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885696556331880866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9880A05CD662612BE9ABEA4A7AB06B72BD41E2BACA6FBF50DD90DB51EFED3628
  • createdAtMillis - 1738424157862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18856965563318808669880A05CD662612BE9ABEA4A7AB06B72BD41E2BACA6FBF50DD90DB51EFED3628