Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 17:43:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A13EF4398BD9FDC6244FF5D247A59718C5453AB5455ECD4BA16E4525FD6079C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the credibility of the journal is a subjective opinion of the author and belongs in comments section

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885696556331880866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A13EF4398BD9FDC6244FF5D247A59718C5453AB5455ECD4BA16E4525FD6079C
  • createdAtMillis - 1738431815486
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18856965563318808662A13EF4398BD9FDC6244FF5D247A59718C5453AB5455ECD4BA16E4525FD6079C