Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 18:35:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03CDE90A0F920A7E15CE8280E3DF79214799E63D894C67D759490D69235612AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the credibility of the journal is a subjective opinion of the author and belongs in comments section

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885696556331880866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03CDE90A0F920A7E15CE8280E3DF79214799E63D894C67D759490D69235612AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1738434902681
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188569655633188086603CDE90A0F920A7E15CE8280E3DF79214799E63D894C67D759490D69235612AF