Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 18:23:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C416A74646F5857CF7AD8E1556F8E2050AC385E91A734AE894DF9E5A50822185
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN/NNN This expresses an opinion and should not be noted unless conclusive, or indisputable evidence, can be provided to the contrary. Directly disputed evidence, such as that in the Daily Mail article, is not a reason for a note, but should be included in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885694545888686191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C416A74646F5857CF7AD8E1556F8E2050AC385E91A734AE894DF9E5A50822185
  • createdAtMillis - 1738434184092
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885694545888686191C416A74646F5857CF7AD8E1556F8E2050AC385E91A734AE894DF9E5A50822185