Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 18:25:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3AD4EDA2270ED06E70C0B23964AA7D88FE20C44E8C38D4E2A03AE6131496D3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN/NNN This expresses an opinion and should not be noted unless conclusive, or indisputable evidence, can be provided to the contrary. Directly disputed evidence, such as that in the Daily Mail article, is not a reason for a note, but should be included in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885694545888686191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3AD4EDA2270ED06E70C0B23964AA7D88FE20C44E8C38D4E2A03AE6131496D3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1738434349643
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885694545888686191B3AD4EDA2270ED06E70C0B23964AA7D88FE20C44E8C38D4E2A03AE6131496D3D