Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 15:38:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D1D25741409E85135A4BFA61C373EAC1E4C88E2D1D64E80D006AB3EC20335A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN/NNN This expresses an opinion and should not be noted unless conclusive, or indisputable evidence, can be provided to the contrary. Directly disputed evidence, such as that in the Daily Mail article, is not a reason for a note, but should be included in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885694545888686191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D1D25741409E85135A4BFA61C373EAC1E4C88E2D1D64E80D006AB3EC20335A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1738424324295
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18856945458886861919D1D25741409E85135A4BFA61C373EAC1E4C88E2D1D64E80D006AB3EC20335A5