Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 14:24:58 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69B1F58C22D8D4C97D6890274CE658FB8D7AC6B854D4E1A407006E86C9F46EB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN/NNN This expresses an opinion and should not be noted unless conclusive, or indisputable evidence, can be provided to the contrary. Directly disputed evidence, such as that in the Daily Mail article, is not a reason for a note, but should be included in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885694545888686191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69B1F58C22D8D4C97D6890274CE658FB8D7AC6B854D4E1A407006E86C9F46EB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1738419898263
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188569454588868619169B1F58C22D8D4C97D6890274CE658FB8D7AC6B854D4E1A407006E86C9F46EB6