Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 22:03:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57FE1E3D45F46F1542F9C3A3159D98E45B8A1BA084DDB9FE24C0B87FA711FA4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN/NNN This expresses an opinion and should not be noted unless conclusive, or indisputable evidence, can be provided to the contrary. Directly disputed evidence, such as that in the Daily Mail article, is not a reason for a note, but should be included in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885694545888686191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57FE1E3D45F46F1542F9C3A3159D98E45B8A1BA084DDB9FE24C0B87FA711FA4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1738533808957
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188569454588868619157FE1E3D45F46F1542F9C3A3159D98E45B8A1BA084DDB9FE24C0B87FA711FA4C