Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 18:56:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1D45B6012D96F55D5DE19DC81E6605EA4F3DF3B6393E4DCB36146A687FAF261
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The claims made in the Advocate article come from the DA pursuing the case, who should not be considered a reliable source.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885689800688296243
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1D45B6012D96F55D5DE19DC81E6605EA4F3DF3B6393E4DCB36146A687FAF261
  • createdAtMillis - 1738436179608
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885689800688296243B1D45B6012D96F55D5DE19DC81E6605EA4F3DF3B6393E4DCB36146A687FAF261