Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-01 06:23:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C39CA0A340CA149796450C3D755B3EC8EA176C6E5F400CCCE3459A0A9801FCF5
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN. The tweet is repeating the claims of the article. To claim Musk isn't involved due to the sources being unnamed is speculative at best. Additionally, reporters often keep the names of sources confidential to prevent retaliation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_protection#:~:text=Journalists%20rely%20on%20source%20protection,in%20response%20to%20their%20revelations.
All Note Details