Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 15:23:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C137ADAC7185D860FE55875D8C58E54F621A7132117C38307C6F7E4EEBB7578B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is repeating the claims of the article. To claim Musk isn't involved due to the sources being unnamed is speculative at best. Additionally, reporters often keep the names of sources confidential to prevent retaliation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_protection#:~:text=Journalists%20rely%20on%20source%20protection,in%20response%20to%20their%20revelations.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885572028155257316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C137ADAC7185D860FE55875D8C58E54F621A7132117C38307C6F7E4EEBB7578B
  • createdAtMillis - 1738423405597
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885572028155257316C137ADAC7185D860FE55875D8C58E54F621A7132117C38307C6F7E4EEBB7578B