Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 03:44:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F80B5E0514493EC3BE151EB8DB482531F0D4671B9F7D869FB68AC8633455BD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is repeating the claims of the article. To claim Musk isn't involved due to the sources being unnamed is speculative at best. Additionally, reporters often keep the names of sources confidential to prevent retaliation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_protection#:~:text=Journalists%20rely%20on%20source%20protection,in%20response%20to%20their%20revelations.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885572028155257316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F80B5E0514493EC3BE151EB8DB482531F0D4671B9F7D869FB68AC8633455BD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1738467840605
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18855720281552573168F80B5E0514493EC3BE151EB8DB482531F0D4671B9F7D869FB68AC8633455BD5