Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 12:48:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66AA7935C7A7C4B4222FE03635288771DF0E8BC98010FD293472EFAC793F1022
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is repeating the claims of the article. To claim Musk isn't involved due to the sources being unnamed is speculative at best. Additionally, reporters often keep the names of sources confidential to prevent retaliation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_protection#:~:text=Journalists%20rely%20on%20source%20protection,in%20response%20to%20their%20revelations.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885572028155257316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66AA7935C7A7C4B4222FE03635288771DF0E8BC98010FD293472EFAC793F1022
  • createdAtMillis - 1738500526083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188557202815525731666AA7935C7A7C4B4222FE03635288771DF0E8BC98010FD293472EFAC793F1022