Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 16:03:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D131D76F632D5B23082A14C8497180DBB694A591EA97CA7AC49E8305F359603
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is repeating the claims of the article. To claim Musk isn't involved due to the sources being unnamed is speculative at best. Additionally, reporters often keep the names of sources confidential to prevent retaliation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_protection#:~:text=Journalists%20rely%20on%20source%20protection,in%20response%20to%20their%20revelations.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885572028155257316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D131D76F632D5B23082A14C8497180DBB694A591EA97CA7AC49E8305F359603
  • createdAtMillis - 1738425835063
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18855720281552573162D131D76F632D5B23082A14C8497180DBB694A591EA97CA7AC49E8305F359603