Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-01 06:47:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 275326D0199DAF57C6A06697C24DE9CB0AC63591EA28DA2FDD64621714AB7875
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is repeating the claims of the article. To claim Musk isn't involved due to the sources being unnamed is speculative at best. Additionally, reporters often keep the names of sources confidential to prevent retaliation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_protection#:~:text=Journalists%20rely%20on%20source%20protection,in%20response%20to%20their%20revelations.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885572028155257316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 275326D0199DAF57C6A06697C24DE9CB0AC63591EA28DA2FDD64621714AB7875
  • createdAtMillis - 1738392447360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885572028155257316275326D0199DAF57C6A06697C24DE9CB0AC63591EA28DA2FDD64621714AB7875