Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 03:19:53 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED9538C59C3DC3BF962F9B12D45BF92277819A6B427F9B5DEE1C5FA5A1AE791B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- a CN for EM's response to a CN is completely unnecessary and childish. If you want to dispute the CN, take it to the OG CN. Start citing sources that are bipartisan and read the executive actions. Do your research by use primary sources, not just secondary sources https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/hiring-freeze/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885551344771043771
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED9538C59C3DC3BF962F9B12D45BF92277819A6B427F9B5DEE1C5FA5A1AE791B
  • createdAtMillis - 1738466393032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885551344771043771ED9538C59C3DC3BF962F9B12D45BF92277819A6B427F9B5DEE1C5FA5A1AE791B