Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-31 11:21:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EA4FB7A9177B228C4F76D29CFAEE92ECFDB31344D8089E62E6E2B59A0E11A69
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note is factually correct, but misses the point of the post. The post was commenting on the ridiculousness of classifying people of 39 as "young people", young people inferring children and teenagers... https://service-manual.nhs.uk/content/inclusive-content/age#:~:text=child%3A%204%20to%2012%20years,this%20may%20vary%20(see%20below)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885058840736960902
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EA4FB7A9177B228C4F76D29CFAEE92ECFDB31344D8089E62E6E2B59A0E11A69
  • createdAtMillis - 1738322516426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18850588407369609020EA4FB7A9177B228C4F76D29CFAEE92ECFDB31344D8089E62E6E2B59A0E11A69