Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-30 17:48:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A8D4B8A20111707388D9CA5A15F7B5EFAEB4C670E618AE169DD7AEF7E6F04D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note provides zero historical data to back up the claim that there was any outlier amount of close calls, and moreover, the claim is completely irrelevant to the tweet. Save opinions for the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885020760030298305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A8D4B8A20111707388D9CA5A15F7B5EFAEB4C670E618AE169DD7AEF7E6F04D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1738259297269
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18850207600302983057A8D4B8A20111707388D9CA5A15F7B5EFAEB4C670E618AE169DD7AEF7E6F04D7