Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-30 18:37:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 385C6F5A5C9DB3DB9E9E323301C357D3F4FBB82A21AE20B5FA5E379F3C00FBBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note provides zero historical data to back up the claim that there was any outlier amount of close calls, and moreover, the claim is completely irrelevant to the tweet. Save opinions for the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885020760030298305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 385C6F5A5C9DB3DB9E9E323301C357D3F4FBB82A21AE20B5FA5E379F3C00FBBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1738262235999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1885020760030298305385C6F5A5C9DB3DB9E9E323301C357D3F4FBB82A21AE20B5FA5E379F3C00FBBE