Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-30 17:46:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F6C8A4E7684B2FF9D2C49A26A181EEAB97937708CEE5ADAFEDA4AA2E6118067
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note provides zero historical data to back up the claim that there was any outlier amount of close calls, and moreover, the claim is completely irrelevant to the tweet. Save opinions for the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1885020760030298305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F6C8A4E7684B2FF9D2C49A26A181EEAB97937708CEE5ADAFEDA4AA2E6118067
  • createdAtMillis - 1738259179416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18850207600302983050F6C8A4E7684B2FF9D2C49A26A181EEAB97937708CEE5ADAFEDA4AA2E6118067