Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-30 12:45:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 294C90585BCAE14B65B762B2CF4A02DD9A02BD99DE82F557414DF219964A54DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Correctiv hat in den relevanten Punkten vor Gericht gewonnen. Nur falsche Sekundärberichterstattung anderer Medien war angreifbar. https://correctiv.org/in-eigener-sache/2024/08/30/correctiv-erfolge-vor-gericht/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884942411199094986
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 294C90585BCAE14B65B762B2CF4A02DD9A02BD99DE82F557414DF219964A54DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1738241111913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1884942411199094986294C90585BCAE14B65B762B2CF4A02DD9A02BD99DE82F557414DF219964A54DA