Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-30 08:45:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8BDD4D2BBEA792DCE15B8ACC0E7602428B83ACC0400749B3F25A28426410EC6C
Participant Details

Original Note:

La couverture en majorité négative sur Trump par la presse traditionnelle américaine est démontrée par plusieurs études : https://www.mrc.org/tv-hits-trump-85-negative-news-vs-78-positive-press-harris https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/19/harvard-study-trump-most-negative-coverage/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/1392722/pew-trump-media-three-times-more-negative-than-for-obama-just-5-percent-positive/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884847555764273599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8BDD4D2BBEA792DCE15B8ACC0E7602428B83ACC0400749B3F25A28426410EC6C
  • createdAtMillis - 1738226741360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18848475557642735998BDD4D2BBEA792DCE15B8ACC0E7602428B83ACC0400749B3F25A28426410EC6C