Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 22:48:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D12C350CADE7EC4C20FC9A039F994C5B5F49843BF9EC862F47432AA5C26CFCAB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Les deux séries sont corrélées par nature aux mêmes événements car c'est la même actualité qui provoque les vagues de tweet et les réaction. Pour que l'étude ait un sens il aurait fallu calculer la corrélation vs d'autres groupes de mots/d'utilisateurs. https://www.jmp.com/fr_ca/statistics-knowledge-portal/what-is-correlation/correlation-coefficient.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884725977101500552
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D12C350CADE7EC4C20FC9A039F994C5B5F49843BF9EC862F47432AA5C26CFCAB
createdAtMillis - 1738190900597
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1884725977101500552D12C350CADE7EC4C20FC9A039F994C5B5F49843BF9EC862F47432AA5C26CFCAB