Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-30 00:18:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8437ACF8B249D64DAD90D80DA6A4C84B62D1C0AE082D95AD55BDDE89A4E3E132
Participant Details

Original Note:

Les deux séries sont corrélées par nature aux mêmes événements car c'est la même actualité qui provoque les vagues de tweet et les réaction. Pour que l'étude ait un sens il aurait fallu calculer la corrélation vs d'autres groupes de mots/d'utilisateurs. https://www.jmp.com/fr_ca/statistics-knowledge-portal/what-is-correlation/correlation-coefficient.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884725977101500552
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8437ACF8B249D64DAD90D80DA6A4C84B62D1C0AE082D95AD55BDDE89A4E3E132
createdAtMillis - 1738196311545
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18847259771015005528437ACF8B249D64DAD90D80DA6A4C84B62D1C0AE082D95AD55BDDE89A4E3E132