Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-02 11:17:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6DEDC0011A2DDA08F28D4D1FA4C9406BC8F8A48C2C77A2D5D87C0BB3F7875186
Participant Details

Original Note:

Les deux séries sont corrélées par nature aux mêmes événements car c'est la même actualité qui provoque les vagues de tweet et les réaction. Pour que l'étude ait un sens il aurait fallu calculer la corrélation vs d'autres groupes de mots/d'utilisateurs. https://www.jmp.com/fr_ca/statistics-knowledge-portal/what-is-correlation/correlation-coefficient.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884725977101500552
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6DEDC0011A2DDA08F28D4D1FA4C9406BC8F8A48C2C77A2D5D87C0BB3F7875186
createdAtMillis - 1738495047656
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18847259771015005526DEDC0011A2DDA08F28D4D1FA4C9406BC8F8A48C2C77A2D5D87C0BB3F7875186