Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-30 00:25:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95D2A03654E104BA3AC2092D37827B427A5205A776DE11826011F671F4DE4898
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rubin first offered an interview, which Daniel Perez accepted. Once accepted, Dave changed the terms to a debate, and now frames Perez as "backing out". Perez agreed to an interview. Rubin is omitting important context. The question is : Why?https://x.com/RubinReport/status/1884254462400946347

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884723152212926829
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95D2A03654E104BA3AC2092D37827B427A5205A776DE11826011F671F4DE4898
  • createdAtMillis - 1738196741144
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 188472315221292682995D2A03654E104BA3AC2092D37827B427A5205A776DE11826011F671F4DE4898