Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 16:58:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0E2EEE11A3044BA58C998B41B6FA508F378ED8C8E3025C13F57FFE23AAACBA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- OP didn't say pre-writing wasn't a practice, they exposed the "journalist's" pre-written BIASED headline before the confirmation even began, which goes against the journalism code of ethics: https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/2010-11/Journalism/index16e4.html?page_id=24 https://journalistsresource.org/home/code-of-ethics/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884633093690052628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0E2EEE11A3044BA58C998B41B6FA508F378ED8C8E3025C13F57FFE23AAACBA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1738169905473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1884633093690052628A0E2EEE11A3044BA58C998B41B6FA508F378ED8C8E3025C13F57FFE23AAACBA4