Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 16:47:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 903F277B852C4EE426C6849022F29270B1799CAD5A2E9F62B6497F693621A948
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- OP didn't say pre-writing wasn't a practice, they exposed the "journalist's" pre-written BIASED headline before the confirmation even began, which goes against the journalism code of ethics: https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/2010-11/Journalism/index16e4.html?page_id=24 https://journalistsresource.org/home/code-of-ethics/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884633093690052628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 903F277B852C4EE426C6849022F29270B1799CAD5A2E9F62B6497F693621A948
  • createdAtMillis - 1738169226629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1884633093690052628903F277B852C4EE426C6849022F29270B1799CAD5A2E9F62B6497F693621A948